Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy
With the extensive application of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) across various domains, their trustworthiness has emerged as a focal point of research. Some existing studies have shown that the integration of large language models (LLMs) can improve the semantic understanding and generation capabilit...
Bewaard in:
| Hoofdauteurs: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formaat: | Artikel |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
2025
|
| Onderwerpen: | |
| Online toegang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 |
| Tags: |
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
|
| _version_ | 1879176658424954880 |
|---|---|
| author | Xue, Ruizhan Deng, Huimin He, Fang Wang, Maojun Zhang, Zeyu |
| author_browse | Deng, Huimin He, Fang Wang, Maojun Xue, Ruizhan Zhang, Zeyu |
| author_facet | Xue, Ruizhan Deng, Huimin He, Fang Wang, Maojun Zhang, Zeyu |
| author_sort | Xue, Ruizhan |
| building | arXiv |
| collection | Acceso abierto |
| description | With the extensive application of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) across various domains, their trustworthiness has emerged as a focal point of research. Some existing studies have shown that the integration of large language models (LLMs) can improve the semantic understanding and generation capabilities of GNNs, which in turn improves the trustworthiness of GNNs from various aspects. Our review introduces a taxonomy that offers researchers a clear framework for comprehending the principles and applications of different methods and helps clarify the connections and differences among various approaches. Then we systematically survey representative approaches along the four categories of our taxonomy. Through our taxonomy, researchers can understand the applicable scenarios, potential advantages, and limitations of each approach for the the trusted integration of GNNs with LLMs. Finally, we present some promising directions of work and future trends for the integration of LLMs and GNNs to improve model trustworthiness. |
| first_indexed | 2026-10-16T00:48:25Z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ https://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><identifier>arxiv-2502.08353</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-13</datestamp>
<dc:title>Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Xue, Ruizhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Deng, Huimin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>He, Fang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Wang, Maojun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zhang, Zeyu</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Machine Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:description>With the extensive application of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) across various domains, their trustworthiness has emerged as a focal point of research. Some existing studies have shown that the integration of large language models (LLMs) can improve the semantic understanding and generation capabilities of GNNs, which in turn improves the trustworthiness of GNNs from various aspects. Our review introduces a taxonomy that offers researchers a clear framework for comprehending the principles and applications of different methods and helps clarify the connections and differences among various approaches. Then we systematically survey representative approaches along the four categories of our taxonomy. Through our taxonomy, researchers can understand the applicable scenarios, potential advantages, and limitations of each approach for the the trusted integration of GNNs with LLMs. Finally, we present some promising directions of work and future trends for the integration of LLMs and GNNs to improve model trustworthiness. </dc:description>
<dc:description>Submitted to IJCAI 2025</dc:description>
<dc:date>2025-02-12</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353</dc:identifier>
</oai_dc:dc> |
| id | arxiv-2502.08353 |
| institution | arXiv |
| last_indexed | 2026-10-16T00:48:25Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| record_format | oai_dc |
| spelling | arxiv-2502.083532025-02-13 Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Xue, Ruizhan Deng, Huimin He, Fang Wang, Maojun Zhang, Zeyu Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence With the extensive application of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) across various domains, their trustworthiness has emerged as a focal point of research. Some existing studies have shown that the integration of large language models (LLMs) can improve the semantic understanding and generation capabilities of GNNs, which in turn improves the trustworthiness of GNNs from various aspects. Our review introduces a taxonomy that offers researchers a clear framework for comprehending the principles and applications of different methods and helps clarify the connections and differences among various approaches. Then we systematically survey representative approaches along the four categories of our taxonomy. Through our taxonomy, researchers can understand the applicable scenarios, potential advantages, and limitations of each approach for the the trusted integration of GNNs with LLMs. Finally, we present some promising directions of work and future trends for the integration of LLMs and GNNs to improve model trustworthiness. Submitted to IJCAI 2025 2025-02-12 text https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 |
| spellingShingle | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Xue, Ruizhan Deng, Huimin He, Fang Wang, Maojun Zhang, Zeyu Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title | Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title_full | Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title_fullStr | Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title_short | Trustworthy GNNs with LLMs: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy |
| title_sort | trustworthy gnns with llms a systematic review and taxonomy |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08353 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xueruizhan trustworthygnnswithllmsasystematicreviewandtaxonomy AT denghuimin trustworthygnnswithllmsasystematicreviewandtaxonomy AT hefang trustworthygnnswithllmsasystematicreviewandtaxonomy AT wangmaojun trustworthygnnswithllmsasystematicreviewandtaxonomy AT zhangzeyu trustworthygnnswithllmsasystematicreviewandtaxonomy |