Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak

How news media frame and emotionally code a public health emergency shapes public risk perception and trust, yet outbreak-coverage dynamics remain understudied for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine sentiment and stance in English-language Bangladeshi coverage of the 2026 measles o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahmed, Shahan
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362
http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1879180229740593152
author Ahmed, Shahan
author_browse Ahmed, Shahan
author_facet Ahmed, Shahan
author_sort Ahmed, Shahan
building arXiv
collection Acceso abierto
description How news media frame and emotionally code a public health emergency shapes public risk perception and trust, yet outbreak-coverage dynamics remain understudied for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine sentiment and stance in English-language Bangladeshi coverage of the 2026 measles outbreak -- the country's most severe in two decades, with over 97,000 suspected cases and 600 deaths across 61 of 64 districts, unfolding after the 2024 change of government and a 2024-2025 vaccine stockout. Using the Internet Archive, we build a reproducible corpus of 403 headlines from seven national outlets (396 in-window in 2026), label them for binary sentiment and four-way stance via a large language model under a locked codebook, and validate against a two-coder human-adjudicated gold standard (n=153; Cohen's kappa=0.89 stance, 0.75 sentiment). Aligned to the DGHS epidemic curve, coverage grew significantly more negative (56% to 88% negative; Cochran-Armitage z=4.12, p<.001) and risk-amplification framing intensified (44% to 84%; z=4.15, p<.001). Media negativity lagged incidence, tracking cumulative mortality. Contrary to the political backdrop, blame remained a minority frame (~9% overall) and was overwhelmingly systemic (32 of 37, 86%) rather than directed at named actors. The pipeline offers a scalable, transparent method for LMIC outbreak-media analysis; Bangladeshi coverage amplified threat far more than it assigned political blame.
first_indexed 2026-10-16T01:45:17Z
format Article
fullrecord <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ https://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><identifier>arxiv-2609.28362</identifier><datestamp>2026-09-24</datestamp> <dc:title>Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak</dc:title> <dc:creator>Ahmed, Shahan</dc:creator> <dc:subject>Social and Information Networks</dc:subject> <dc:subject>Computers and Society</dc:subject> <dc:subject>I.2.7; J.4</dc:subject> <dc:description>How news media frame and emotionally code a public health emergency shapes public risk perception and trust, yet outbreak-coverage dynamics remain understudied for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine sentiment and stance in English-language Bangladeshi coverage of the 2026 measles outbreak -- the country's most severe in two decades, with over 97,000 suspected cases and 600 deaths across 61 of 64 districts, unfolding after the 2024 change of government and a 2024-2025 vaccine stockout. Using the Internet Archive, we build a reproducible corpus of 403 headlines from seven national outlets (396 in-window in 2026), label them for binary sentiment and four-way stance via a large language model under a locked codebook, and validate against a two-coder human-adjudicated gold standard (n=153; Cohen's kappa=0.89 stance, 0.75 sentiment). Aligned to the DGHS epidemic curve, coverage grew significantly more negative (56% to 88% negative; Cochran-Armitage z=4.12, p&lt;.001) and risk-amplification framing intensified (44% to 84%; z=4.15, p&lt;.001). Media negativity lagged incidence, tracking cumulative mortality. Contrary to the political backdrop, blame remained a minority frame (~9% overall) and was overwhelmingly systemic (32 of 37, 86%) rather than directed at named actors. The pipeline offers a scalable, transparent method for LMIC outbreak-media analysis; Bangladeshi coverage amplified threat far more than it assigned political blame. </dc:description> <dc:description>10 pages, 2 figures</dc:description> <dc:date>2026-09-23</dc:date> <dc:type>text</dc:type> <dc:identifier>https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362</dc:identifier> <dc:identifier>http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362</dc:identifier> </oai_dc:dc>
id arxiv-2609.28362
institution arXiv
last_indexed 2026-10-16T01:45:17Z
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format oai_dc
spelling arxiv-2609.283622026-09-24 Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak Ahmed, Shahan Social and Information Networks Computers and Society I.2.7; J.4 How news media frame and emotionally code a public health emergency shapes public risk perception and trust, yet outbreak-coverage dynamics remain understudied for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine sentiment and stance in English-language Bangladeshi coverage of the 2026 measles outbreak -- the country's most severe in two decades, with over 97,000 suspected cases and 600 deaths across 61 of 64 districts, unfolding after the 2024 change of government and a 2024-2025 vaccine stockout. Using the Internet Archive, we build a reproducible corpus of 403 headlines from seven national outlets (396 in-window in 2026), label them for binary sentiment and four-way stance via a large language model under a locked codebook, and validate against a two-coder human-adjudicated gold standard (n=153; Cohen's kappa=0.89 stance, 0.75 sentiment). Aligned to the DGHS epidemic curve, coverage grew significantly more negative (56% to 88% negative; Cochran-Armitage z=4.12, p<.001) and risk-amplification framing intensified (44% to 84%; z=4.15, p<.001). Media negativity lagged incidence, tracking cumulative mortality. Contrary to the political backdrop, blame remained a minority frame (~9% overall) and was overwhelmingly systemic (32 of 37, 86%) rather than directed at named actors. The pipeline offers a scalable, transparent method for LMIC outbreak-media analysis; Bangladeshi coverage amplified threat far more than it assigned political blame. 10 pages, 2 figures 2026-09-23 text https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362
spellingShingle Social and Information Networks
Computers and Society
I.2.7; J.4
Ahmed, Shahan
Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title_full Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title_fullStr Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title_short Threat Amplified, Blame Restrained: LLM-Assisted Media Framing Analysis of the 2026 Bangladesh Measles Outbreak
title_sort threat amplified blame restrained llm assisted media framing analysis of the 2026 bangladesh measles outbreak
topic Social and Information Networks
Computers and Society
I.2.7; J.4
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362
http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28362
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedshahan threatamplifiedblamerestrainedllmassistedmediaframinganalysisofthe2026bangladeshmeaslesoutbreak