Las primeras traducciones del Persiles ante las ambigüedades del Septentrión cervantino a nivel geográfico y religioso: en busca de pistas sobre la temprana recepción de la novela
More than 400 years after the first edition of Persiles, its fictional geography is still puzzling. This article scans its labyrinthine northern archipelago, but guided by the first translators of Persiles: the French François de Rosset and Vital d’Audiguier (translations of 1618); the anonymous au...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7270477 |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | More than 400 years after the first edition of Persiles, its fictional geography is still puzzling. This article scans its labyrinthine northern archipelago, but
guided by the first translators of Persiles: the French François de Rosset and Vital d’Audiguier (translations of 1618); the anonymous author of the English version of
1619; the Italian Francesco Ellio (1626); as well as Madame Le Givre Du Richebourg, author of another later but also freer French translation of 1738.
It is proposed to examine how some ambiguities of the text regarding Nordic geography and religious issues have been translated (and then interpreted), if for
example the translators were tempted to identify fictional places (such as Hibernia or Golandia) with real territories. By observing how the text traveled from one
language to another, there are indications about the early reception of the novel, especially as regards the question of its verisimilitude and its relations (or not) with
the confessional and political conflicts that upset Europe at that time |
|---|