Ontological Difference and Indeterminacy of Interpretation
At issue in this paper is the unfinished dialogue between hermeneutic phenomenology and hermeneutic logic. The paper touches upon two historical contexts of this dialogue. In scrutinizing them I discuss the relationship between philosophical hermeneutics and nonrepresentationalist epistemology. Th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7576124 |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | At issue in this paper is the unfinished dialogue between hermeneutic phenomenology and hermeneutic logic. The paper touches upon two historical contexts of this dialogue.
In scrutinizing them I discuss the relationship
between philosophical hermeneutics and nonrepresentationalist epistemology. The view gets
spelled out that the norms of truthfulness,
objectivity, empirical adequacy, and other epistemological characteristics of interpretation
become generated within characteristic hermeneutic situations. By elaborating on Heidegger’s
nexus between projected understanding and
interpretative articulation, the notion of hermeneutic fore-structuring of interpretative practices is introduced. Scrutinizing this notion allows
one to circumscribe characteristic hermeneutic
situations. |
|---|