Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia
<p id="p1">This paper explores the essence and activities of Innocence Projects and the broader Innocence Movement in the United States and Europe, adopting positive practices for potential amendments to Croatian legislation to protect the rights of wrongfully convicted persons as a special group of...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
IntechOpen
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89608 |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1879164828398911488 |
|---|---|
| author | Primorac, Damir Sokanovic, Lucija Bozhinovski, Andrej |
| author_browse | Bozhinovski, Andrej Primorac, Damir Sokanovic, Lucija |
| author_facet | Primorac, Damir Sokanovic, Lucija Bozhinovski, Andrej |
| author_sort | Primorac, Damir |
| building | IntechOpen |
| collection | Acceso abierto |
| description | <p id="p1">This paper explores the essence and activities of Innocence Projects and the broader Innocence Movement in the United States and Europe, adopting positive practices for potential amendments to Croatian legislation to protect the rights of wrongfully convicted persons as a special group of victims. Furthermore, it examines the opportunities and obstacles in conducting postconviction DNA testing within Croatian law. Furthermore, it showcases preliminary findings from field research conducted across four county courts in Croatia, highlighting challenges in establishing new evidence (“novum”) and reopening criminal cases. The methodology integrates various approaches: the historical method traces the evolution of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the theoretical method provides an analytical framework for understanding the principles underpinning the Innocence Movement and common reasons for miscarriages of justice; the comparative method contrasts operational models in adversarial and continental law systems; the normative method details Croatian laws on DNA evidence; and the case-study method reviews judicial practices in the County Courts of Split, Rijeka, Osijek, and Zadar. The research spans cases from 2011 to 2021 and includes semistructured interviews with judges to explore challenges in renewing criminal procedures, issues with DNA evidence, and the implications of current legislation. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces the origins, nature, and scope of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the second part focuses on the Croatian Innocence Project and relevant laws; and the third part presents field research findings, court practices, and Supreme Court positions regarding the novum criteria. The final chapter summarizes practices and experiences, offering recommendations and conclusions.</p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5772/intechopen.115287 |
| first_indexed | 2026-10-15T21:40:32Z |
| format | Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><identifier>intech-89608</identifier><datestamp>2024-07-15</datestamp>
<dc:title>Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Damir Primorac</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Lucija Sokanovic</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Andrej Bozhinovski</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Health Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:description><p id="p1">This paper explores the essence and activities of Innocence Projects and the broader Innocence Movement in the United States and Europe, adopting positive practices for potential amendments to Croatian legislation to protect the rights of wrongfully convicted persons as a special group of victims. Furthermore, it examines the opportunities and obstacles in conducting postconviction DNA testing within Croatian law. Furthermore, it showcases preliminary findings from field research conducted across four county courts in Croatia, highlighting challenges in establishing new evidence (&ldquo;novum&rdquo;) and reopening criminal cases. The methodology integrates various approaches: the historical method traces the evolution of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the theoretical method provides an analytical framework for understanding the principles underpinning the Innocence Movement and common reasons for miscarriages of justice; the comparative method contrasts operational models in adversarial and continental law systems; the normative method details Croatian laws on DNA evidence; and the case-study method reviews judicial practices in the County Courts of Split, Rijeka, Osijek, and Zadar. The research spans cases from 2011 to 2021 and includes semistructured interviews with judges to explore challenges in renewing criminal procedures, issues with DNA evidence, and the implications of current legislation. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces the origins, nature, and scope of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the second part focuses on the Croatian Innocence Project and relevant laws; and the third part presents field research findings, court practices, and Supreme Court positions regarding the novum criteria. The final chapter summarizes practices and experiences, offering recommendations and conclusions.</p></dc:description>
<dc:publisher>IntechOpen</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2024-07-15</dc:date>
<dc:type>Chapter, Part Of Book</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89608</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.5772/intechopen.115287</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>ISBN:978-0-85014-000-2</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:source>https://www.intechopen.com/books/13953 ; Forensic Science and Molecular Anthropology - Topics Selected from 12th ISABS Conference on Forensic and Anthropological Genetics</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc> |
| id | intech-89608 |
| institution | IntechOpen |
| isbn | 978-0-85014-000-2 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-10-15T21:40:32Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | IntechOpen |
| publisherStr | IntechOpen |
| record_format | oai_dc |
| spelling | intech-896082024-07-15 Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia Damir Primorac Lucija Sokanovic Andrej Bozhinovski Health Sciences <p id="p1">This paper explores the essence and activities of Innocence Projects and the broader Innocence Movement in the United States and Europe, adopting positive practices for potential amendments to Croatian legislation to protect the rights of wrongfully convicted persons as a special group of victims. Furthermore, it examines the opportunities and obstacles in conducting postconviction DNA testing within Croatian law. Furthermore, it showcases preliminary findings from field research conducted across four county courts in Croatia, highlighting challenges in establishing new evidence (“novum”) and reopening criminal cases. The methodology integrates various approaches: the historical method traces the evolution of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the theoretical method provides an analytical framework for understanding the principles underpinning the Innocence Movement and common reasons for miscarriages of justice; the comparative method contrasts operational models in adversarial and continental law systems; the normative method details Croatian laws on DNA evidence; and the case-study method reviews judicial practices in the County Courts of Split, Rijeka, Osijek, and Zadar. The research spans cases from 2011 to 2021 and includes semistructured interviews with judges to explore challenges in renewing criminal procedures, issues with DNA evidence, and the implications of current legislation. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces the origins, nature, and scope of Innocence Projects in the US and Europe; the second part focuses on the Croatian Innocence Project and relevant laws; and the third part presents field research findings, court practices, and Supreme Court positions regarding the novum criteria. The final chapter summarizes practices and experiences, offering recommendations and conclusions.</p> IntechOpen 2024-07-15 Chapter, Part Of Book https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89608 doi:10.5772/intechopen.115287 en ISBN:978-0-85014-000-2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ https://www.intechopen.com/books/13953 ; Forensic Science and Molecular Anthropology - Topics Selected from 12th ISABS Conference on Forensic and Anthropological Genetics |
| spellingShingle | Health Sciences Primorac, Damir Sokanovic, Lucija Bozhinovski, Andrej Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title | Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title_full | Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title_fullStr | Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title_short | Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: Innocence Project Croatia |
| title_sort | correcting miscarriages of justice innocence project croatia |
| topic | Health Sciences |
| url | https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89608 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT primoracdamir correctingmiscarriagesofjusticeinnocenceprojectcroatia AT sokanoviclucija correctingmiscarriagesofjusticeinnocenceprojectcroatia AT bozhinovskiandrej correctingmiscarriagesofjusticeinnocenceprojectcroatia |