Meta-avaliação do SINAES: a visão dos avaliadores ad hoc
The study aims to carry out a meta-evaluation of SINAES as a public policy for the evaluation of higher education from the perspective of the ad hoc evaluators of INEP/MEC. The methodology is designed as an exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, with a sample stratified by region of 369 ev...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | portugués |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9943249 |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The study aims to carry out a meta-evaluation of SINAES as a public policy for the evaluation of higher education from the perspective of the ad hoc evaluators of INEP/MEC. The methodology is designed as an exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, with a sample stratified by region of 369 evaluators. Data were collected using desurvey and processed in Excel® using descriptive statistics. The results show a predominance of doctor evaluators (66%) with less than 10 years (51%) of participation in BASis. The analysis demonstrates the need to differentiate assessment instruments between acts, modality and types of HEIs, to improve the system to speed up the processes, in addition to reviewing the ENADE methodology and the quality indicators derived from it. |
|---|