Conspiracy theories towards language development: a case of online engagements
With the ascendancy of digitalization over traditional modes of communication in the rapid dissemination of information, a proliferation of unsubstantiated claims has emerged, particularly within the domain of online learning. Such claims, frequently equated with fabrications, exert a notable influe...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10782165 |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | With the ascendancy of digitalization over traditional modes of communication in the rapid dissemination of information, a proliferation of unsubstantiated claims has emerged, particularly within the domain of online learning. Such claims, frequently equated with fabrications, exert a notable influence on the shaping of public discourse. In this context, the present study seeks to examine the impact of conspiracy theories on language development within online learning environments. This qualitative investigation employed focus group interviews as the primary data collection method, chosen for their capacity to elicit in-depth insights into participants’ lived experiences. The research sample comprised six conveniently selected teachers responsible for delivering language-related modules across varying levels of student registration. Data were obtained through the administration of open-ended questions, which facilitated the exploration of teachers’ perceptions regarding the intersection of online learning and language development. The findings of the study underscore two principal concerns: (i) the necessity of investing in fact-checking initiatives to counteract the circulation of unverified information, and (ii) the detrimental impact of misinformation on public attitudes, which, in turn, undermines language development and disrupts established educational practices. In light of these outcomes, the study recommends the systematic promotion of digital media literacy as a pedagogical strategy to strengthen learners’ linguistic competencies while simultaneously mitigating the influence of misinformation in online spaces. Ultimately, these measures converge toward the cultivation of learners as critical thinkers capable of navigating the complexities of digital communication. |
|---|